On view

American Art
Wilmerding Pavilion
Sarah Shaw Anschutz Gallery

The Hartley Family,

ca. 1787

Henry Benbridge, 1743–1812; born and died Philadelphia, PA
y1986-84
Although disparate in appearance, function, and date of production, this grand portrait and the utilitarian storage jar installed nearby were both produced in South Carolina and have associations with what the politician John C. Calhoun termed the “peculiar institution” of slavery. Calhoun first used that insidious euphemism in 1830 to defend the use of enslaved labor while serving as Vice President of the United States. He grew up near Edgefield, South Carolina, the site of the manufactory where the enslaved artisan known as Dave later made masterful stoneware vessels such as the one displayed here. The Hartley Family also derives from slavery: the four generations of related women it depicts in lavish dress and surroundings—arranged clockwise from oldest to youngest to suggest the durability of their world—were members of a coastal plantation family whose great wealth was enabled by the same system of human bondage that produced the humble jar.

More Context

Handbook Entry

After six years of artistic study in Rome, Henry ­Benbridge, a Philadelphia native, returned to America by way of London (and, probably, ­Benjamin West’s studio), settling in Charleston, South Carolina, where between 1772 and at least 1790 he was the leading artist in that wealthy, style-­conscious, Anglophilic city. <em>The Hartley Family</em>, perhaps his most ambitious work, and among the major compositions produced in America during the eighteenth century, depicts four female generations of the same prominent family — none of whom, curiously, was named Hartley when the painting was executed — in the crisp, strongly modeled, Neoclassical style Benbridge employed throughout his career. Although the sitters’ nondescript "portrait dress," characteristic of period imagery, and the similarly generic setting in which they are placed impart a timelessness to the scene, its intergenerational aspect is underscored by the spatial arrangement and poses of the subjects, particularly their linked hands and arms, which collectively suggest a circle moving clockwise from eldest to youngest sitter, as if to subtly indicate the march of time across the family’s history. Such an impression is bolstered by the background’s complementary transition from dark to light, by the gradually increasing brightness of the progressively younger subjects’ clothing, and by the heightened legibility and display of their youthful bodies, pictorially signifying their greater vitality.

Information

Title
The Hartley Family
Dates

ca. 1787

Medium
Oil on canvas
Dimensions
194 × 151 cm (76 3/8 × 59 7/16 in.) frame: 222.2 × 178.8 × 9 cm (87 1/2 × 70 3/8 × 3 9/16 in.)
Credit Line
Gift of Maitland A. Edey, Class of 1932
Object Number
y1986-84
Place Made

North America, United States, South Carolina

Culture
Materials

Commissioned for Sarah Hartley (central figure); inherited by her daughter, Mrs. Edward Armstrong (on the right), Danksammer House, Marlboro on Hudson; inherited by her son, David Maitland Armstrong (1836-1917), New York (NY); bequeathed to his widow, Helena Neilson Armstrong (1845-1926); inherited by the widow of her eldest son (E. Maitland Armstrong), Maud Gwendolen King (1876-1978), Kingscote, Newport (RI); inherited by her daughter, Gwendolyn Armstrong Rivers (1911-1972), Kingscote, Newport (RI); inherited by Maitland A. Edey; donated to the Princeton University Art Museum, 1986 [1]. [1] In a letter dated January 19, 1987, the donor provided the museum with the provenance record of the