Edvard Munch: Symbolism in Print, Masterworks from the Museum of Modern Art, New York

Norwegian artist Edvard Munch (1863–1944), like other Symbolist artists and writers throughout Europe in the 1890s, rejected the Impressionist practice of studying the effects of light on the exterior world and instead looked inward to explore themes of love and jealousy, loneliness and anxiety, sickness and death. Although most recognized for his celebrated paintings—including The Scream (1893)—Munch was among the most innovative printmakers of the modern era. His mastery of a broad variety of print media paralleled his rapid development as a painter in the last decade of the nineteenth century. From his first prints, made in Berlin in 1894, to the lithographs and woodcuts that accompanied his triumphant exhibition of the Frieze of Life painting cycle in 1902, the practices of painting, drawing, and printmaking were intertwined for Munch.

Edvard Munch (Norwegian, 1863–1944), Death in the Sickroom (Døden i sykeværelset), 1896. Lithograph, 42.8 x 57.6 cm. The Museum of Modern Art, New York, gift of Abby Aldrich Rockefeller by exchange (561.1951). © 2014 The Munch Museum / The Munch-Ellingsen Group / Artists Rights Society (ARS), NYRaised in the working-class tenements of Kristiania (renamed Oslo in 1924) at a time of great social and political change in northern Europe, Munch had lost both of his parents as well as his sister Sophie to tuberculosis by the age of twenty-five. Frail health and depression plagued the artist throughout his life, leaving him with a firm determination to create art that addressed universal conditions of modern life as distilled from memories of his troubled past.

In 1889, Munch was awarded a scholarship to study in Paris, where he encountered the work of Vincent van Gogh, Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec, Georges Seurat, and Paul Signac at the Salon des Indépendants, as well as the Symbolist paintings and lithographs of Paul Gauguin at the Synchronists and Impressionists exhibition at the Universal Exposition. This work had a profound effect on the young artist, and he gradually abandoned his former Impressionist style in favor of a boldly painted, introspective form of Symbolism. Munch declared in his oft-cited St. Cloud Manifesto of 1889: “No longer would interiors, people who knit and read be painted. There should be living people who breathe and feel, suffer and love.”Edvard Munch, The Kiss (Kyss), 1895. Etching and drypoint, 55.8 x 44.1 cm. The Museum of Modern Art, New York, The William B. Jaffe and Evelyn A. J. Hall Collection (1163.1968). c 2014 The Munch Museum/ The Munch-Ellingsen Group / Artists Rights Society (ARS), NY

Over the next three years, while living in the Parisian suburb of St. Cloud, spending the winter months in Nice, and summering in the fishing village of Åsgårdstrand, Norway, Munch developed some of his most iconic Symbolist motifs. He exhibited his paintings in Kristiania and Copenhagen, and the success of these exhibitions led to a solo presentation at the prestigious Berlin Artists Association in 1892. The exhibition featured a series of six provocative paintings that included early versions of Kiss, Jealousy, and Despair, collectively titled Study for a Series: Love. They depicted, in the artist’s words, “the struggle between man and woman called Love.” Outraged members of the conservative association voted to close the show after only one week. The ensuing scandal made the artist an overnight sensation in German modernist circles and led to further exhibitions throughout Germany. Capitalizing on his newfound notoriety, Munch moved to Berlin in 1893.

With the death of his father in 1889, Munch had become responsible for supporting his family financially. Although he was exhibiting widely, painting sales were scarce, and his income was largely derived from the admission fees he charged for his controversial exhibitions. Munch’s financial need, coupled with a desire to make his work better known to a broader public, led to his initial explorations with prints late in 1894. The artist produced his first etchings and drypoints in the Berlin workshop of master printmaker L. Angerer, who had published the brooding etchings of Germanic Post-Romantic painters such as Max Klinger, Arnold Bocklin, and Franz von Stuck—artists whose psychologically charged subject matter resonated with the young Norwegian’s Symbolist themes.

In 1895 the art historian Julius Meier-Graefe, editor of the short-lived but influential Art Nouveau journal Pan, published eight of Munch’s etchings and drypoints. An essay in the portfolio introduced the artist to an international audience. Sales were slow, however, and the portfolio was not a financial success. Later that year, Munch expanded his printmaking activities in Berlin to include lithography, most notably producing two large monochromatic lithographs based on painted femme fatale compositions: Madonna and Vampire.

Edvard Munch, Anxiety, 1896. Lithograph, 57.1 x 43.1 cm. The Museum of Modern Art, New York, Abby Aldrich Rockefeller Fund (1656.1940). c 2014 The Munch Museum / The Munch-Ellingsen Group / Artists Rights Society (ARS), NYMunch returned to Paris in 1896 to exhibit at the Salon des Indépendants and the Salon de l’Art Nouveau, and, in the workshop of Auguste Clot, he continued to produce extraordinary lithographs derived from his painted compositions. These included multiple color variations of The Sick Child II, which recalls the death of his beloved sister Sophie; the two-color lithograph Anxiety, published by the enterprising dealer Ambroise Vollard; and Death in the Sick Room, a bold black-and-white composition evocative of the woodcut techniques fashionable in Parisian Art Nouveau circles. By the fall of 1896, Munch had begun to experiment with his own woodcuts, the technique with which he would make some of his greatest innovations to the art of printmaking.

Although Munch probably never met Paul Gauguin, he would have seen the French artist’s Tahitian-inspired woodcuts in the fall of 1895 at the apartment of William Mollard, a Norwegian state official friendly with the Scandinavian artistic and literary community in Paris. Gauguin had entrusted Mollard, his upstairs neighbor, with the safekeeping of his work—including the remaining proofs and impressions of his Noa Noa woodcuts, together with the woodblocks he used to create them—when he returned to the South Seas in the summer of 1895. Coarsely carved and printed by hand, Gauguin’s distinctive woodcuts were then only known to his circle of friends, who admired them for their seemingly primitive execution, bold color, and exotic subject matter. Edvard Munch, Two Women on the Shore (To kvinner ved stranden), 1898. Woodcut, 51.3 x 56.9 cm. The Museum of Modern Art, New York, purchase (1190.1968). c 2014 The Munch Museum / The Munch-Ellingsen Group / Artists Rights Society (ARS), NY

While the color woodcuts that Munch began to make in 1896 are clearly indebted to Gauguin’s example, the process by which he made them took on an entirely new character. Munch’s woodblocks were larger than Gauguin’s and often made from native woods like spruce, oak, and birch, weathered to impart a naturalistic grained texture to the final impressions. In addition,  Munch devised a unique method in which he used a fret saw to cut his finished woodblocks into three or four puzzle-like shapes along pictorial contours, inked each piece separately, and reassembled them before printing the image, as in the color woodcut Two Women on the Shore. Printed in this way, Munch’s woodcuts display a curious effect in which his figures appear disassociated from each other and separated from their surroundings.

Munch often used proofs of his lithographs and woodcuts as the foundation for drawings, embellishing them with watercolor and gouache to further accentuate their symbolic content. The artist’s search for graphic means to refine key pictorial themes eventually led him to novel combinations of printmaking techniques in a single work, best exemplified by the two large master prints Madonna and Vampire II. Munch first created these prints as lithographs in 1895 and revised them in 1902 with the addition of colored woodcut blocks to enhance their dark and sinister mood.

Edvard Munch, Vampire II (Vampyr II), 1895–1902. Lithograph and woodcut, 56.9 x 70.1 cm. The Museum of Modern Art, New York, The William B. Jaffe and Evelyn A. J. Hall Collection (1167.1968). c 2014 The Munch Museum / The Munch-Ellingsen Group / Artists Rights Society (ARS), NYThroughout the 1890s, Munch developed his series of thematically related paintings on the subject of love while expanding it to include meditations on anxiety and death. In 1902, with his international fame reaching new heights, he was invited to contribute to the fifth exhibition of the Berlin Secession, a group of independent German artists who championed modernist tendencies in defiance of the government-sponsored Berlin Artists Association. Munch selected twenty-two of his most iconic paintings from throughout his career and displayed them under the collective title Frieze: Cycle of Moments from Life. They were divided into four thematic sections: love, the passing of love, anxiety, and death. The artist installed his work along all four walls of the Sculpture Hall, with the paintings hanging in a continuous row above eye level and a tier of related prints prominently displayed below. The exhibition was a monumental success, finally validating Munch’s reputation in Berlin as one of the leading painters—and printmakers—of his generation.

Calvin Brown
Associate Curator of Prints and Drawings