Exhibition | Body Matters / Martha Friedman
In Mummy Wheat and A Natural Thickening of Thought, Friedman draws inspiration from sources as diverse as ancient Egyptian mummification, Greco-Roman portrait busts, nineteenth-century public monuments, and early twentieth-century drawings of the central nervous system. She discussed her inspirations and interests with Mitra Abbaspour, Haskell Curator of Modern and Contemporary Art, who organized the exhibition.
MA: Rubber is the primary medium in many of your bodies of work; what originally drew you to rubber, and what keeps you coming back to it?
MF: It began as a practical interest, and then it evolved into a more abstract metaphorical interest. When I was young, I tried to make a mold of a dead, twisted tree branch using just plaster. It ended up as a rigid ten-part mold, and I needed to figure out the mechanics of how all those parts could separate and then fit back together. Then, at art school, I learned that there was rubber that you could introduce into this mold-making system so that you didn’t need to account for so many twists and turns. Sometimes, as I make art, the tool I’m using starts to become a primary object of interest. That’s what happened to me with rubber. Eventually, I came to experience rubber as a metaphor for the body. Rubber sits between liquid and solid, it feels fleshy, there’s a whimsy to it, it responds to pressure. It has a lot of possibilities as an analogue to the body.
MF: There’s something viscerally interesting to me about freezing a body in time and stopping it from disintegrating (not unlike many of my ongoing preoccupations as a sculptor). In mummification, preserving the body requires pulling out all the liquid by removing the brains and viscera to desiccate the corpse. Liquidity has to be harnessed and removed in order for this stasis to happen so that this previously wet body can then transport the soul to the afterlife. While studying mummies, I became very interested in the bandaging, which is what holds the body together, protecting it from outside forces while also absorbing atmospheric interference and moisture. As a result, I began casting thin, translucent rubber ribbons that stand in for the linen strips in which mummies were wrapped. These wrappings were highly valued and incredibly important to the Egyptians, and for a long time archaeologists and plunderers were indifferent to that. For centuries tomb raiders quickly cut off and discarded the wrappings in search of the amulets that were buried with the bodies. The wrapping as a discarded skin became another interest of mine. I’m fascinated by things that are discarded. In the studio, I often mine the remnants and discards from my previous work and upcycle them into new work. I think discards can tell us a lot about our priorities and assumptions.
MA: In A Natural Thickening of Thought, you’re creating compositions in conversation with the drawings of the fin de siècle physician and medical researcher Santiago Ramón y Cajal (1852–1934). How would you describe your relationship to Cajal’s drawings?
MF: I was really attracted to these drawings of Cajal’s because he was trying to study and represent the tiny structures in our brains that in large part make us who we are. An attempt to visualize and pinpoint where a person’s self lies, despite its existential futility, is a rewarding search that leads to impactful scientific discoveries. Cajal’s drawings in particular have a strong subjective presence and singular aesthetic style. He would look into the microscope at a certain type of sensory cell, often one that was broken or damaged. He would look at these damaged cells for an entire morning. Then he would take lunch and come back and try to draw them from memory. After that, he would go back and look at them through the microscope and correct his renderings. He had set up a system to mine his own neuronal pathways to make the drawings.
MA: How are you thinking about the role of light in A Natural Thickening of Thought?
MF: Illuminating the layers of poured rubber in these pictures accentuates rubber’s ability to exist in both liquid and solid states. There’s an inherent sense of eeriness to rubber in the way that it feels and looks, and illuminating it from behind amplifies this strangeness. These works are inspired by Cajal’s nineteenth-century drawings of neuron cells, and having the paintings sit on top of a light source alludes to a slide on the stage of a microscope. It’s meant to invoke the idea of learning or searching or trying to understand what something looks like—so that the works become representative of the process of visualization and materialization.
MA: In these works, you’re painting with rubber for the first time. Did this feel like a novel engagement with the material, and what did you learn from it?
MA: In what ways are you thinking about scale and interaction with your viewers’ bodies in creating these paintings?
MF: I think in all my work I’m playing with scale to try and engage a sensory system and bodily sensibility that is either in tandem with or supersedes an intellectual reading of the work. The rubber neurons are drawings of science in a way. They’re a subjective representation of science, but I blew them up to a larger scale and rendered them in this material that feels very tactile and animated. You can almost sense that something’s alive in rubber, if you don’t think about it too much.
MA: What are the origins of the titles for these two series?
The series of illuminated rubber paintings are titled A Natural Thickening of Thought. Cajal was instrumental in discovering that as you age some of your neurons, and the networks around them, get thickened or gunked up (see Floating Thought 12). Rubber is a liquid thing that thickens and congeals, and my pictorial renderings of neurons index my own thinking as I create the composition, like an image of my thoughts frozen inside rubber. Ambered.
Art@Bainbridge is made possible through the generous support of the Virginia and Bagley Wright, Class of 1946, Program Fund for Modern and Contemporary Art; the Kathleen C. Sherrerd Program Fund for American Art; Joshua R. Slocum, Class of 1998, and Sara Slocum; and Barbara and Gerald Essig. Additional support is provided by Stacey Roth Goergen, Class of 1990, and Robert B. Goergen; and the Morley and Jean Melden Education Fund for Prints and Drawings.