Interpretation
This painting is an example of Indian Company School painting. As the British East India Company expanded its activities in South Asia during the late 1700s, great numbers of its employees moved from England to carve out new lives for themselves in India. As they traveled throughout the country and encountered novel flora and fauna, stunning ancient monuments, and "exotic" new people, they wanted to capture these images to send or take home. Whereas a modern tourist would rely on a camera for such a task, eighteenth- and nineteenth-century travelers hired Indian painters. The works produced by these artists, undertaken in a European style and palette, are known as "Company" paintings. They are characterized by the use of watercolors (instead of gouache, which was used in traditional Indian paintings) and by the appearance of linear perspective and shading. This charming yellow-footed green pigeon—the state bird of Mahashtra, in the west-central region of the subcontinent—comes from an album commissioned by James Nathaniel Rind (d. 1814), who lived in India between 1778 and 1801.
Information
- Title
- Study of a Yellow-footed Green Pigeon, Illustration from the Rind Album
- Object Number
- 2017-31
- Medium
- Watercolor on English laid paper
- Dates
- ca. 1800
- Dimensions
- 55 × 38 cm (21 5/8 × 14 15/16 in.)
- Credit Line
- Museum purchase, Hugh Leander Adams, Mary Trumbull Adams and Hugh Trumbull Adams Princeton Art Fund
- Culture
- Indian
- Place made
- India, Calcutta
- Inscriptions
- In graphite on verso: JNR, 4 In graphite on verso, upper left: N.142
- Marks/Labels/Seals
- Watermark behind the body of the pigeon with a Strasburg Lily above the letters GR
- Materials
- Techniques
–1971 Mrs. S. Richardson and Mrs. S. M. Norman (London, UK), sold at Sotheby’s (London, UK), July 13, 1971.
1970s Sven Gahlin (1934–2017; London, UK).
1970s K.J. Hewett (1919–94; London, UK).
1970s–2017 Private Collection (London, UK).
–2017 Private Collection, through Forge & Lynch (London, UK), sold to the Princeton University Art Museum, 2017.
Feedback
The Museum regularly researches its objects and their collecting histories, updating its records to reflect new information. We also strive to catalogue works of art using language that is consistent with how people, subjects, artists, and cultures describe themselves. As this effort is ongoing, the Museum’s records may be incomplete or contain terms that are no longer acceptable. We welcome your feedback, questions, and additional information that you feel may be useful to us. Email us at collectionsinfo@princeton.edu.
Want to use an image from the Museum's collections? Review our image use and access policies.