On view
The Visitation,
1643–48
The Virgin Mary, who has just learned of her divine pregnancy from the archangel Gabriel, greets her cousin Elizabeth. Formerly infertile, Elizabeth is now six months pregnant with John the Baptist. Behind the two women are Mary’s fiancé, Joseph, and Elizabeth’s husband, Zacharias.
Champaigne was a follower of the Jansenist movement, which used art as an aid to religious meditation and eliminated decorative, sensuous elements. In this painting, he relied on restrained gestures to present a concentrated narrative in which these two women meet and recognize their shared destiny as mothers of holy figures.
More Context
Handbook Entry
Philippe de Champaigne, a founding member of the Académie Royale de Peinture et de Sculpture, was a follower of the Jansenist movement, which sought to use art as an aid to meditation and eliminate decorative, sensuous elements. These holy figures are bathed in a raking light representing God’s grace, as they recognize their destinies, the Virgin to bear the Savior and her elderly cousin, Elizabeth, to give birth to Saint John the Baptist. When Mary visited Elizabeth to inform her of her pregnancy, she spoke the verses known as the Magnificat: "My soul doth magnify the Lord" (Luke 1:41, 46–55). Joseph and Zechariah witness the scene and marvel at God’s plan for salvation. The artist repeated this composition in both full- and half-length formats. One of them was once part of the decoration of a chapel in the Church of the Oratory in Paris. There, the Visitation and Dream of Joseph were on the sidewalls, while the Nativity was on the altar. In a narrow chapel, the formula of placing the figures in a shallow, shadow-box-like space would have created an especially theatrical effect. Indeed, the remarkably concentrated narrative, with the restrained gestures of the figures, has affinities with French classical theater of the time. Derived from ancient theater as defined in Aristotle’s <em>Poetics</em>, seventeenth-century French theater evolved from Baroque effects toward a purified and rigorous theatrical practice, in which props were eliminated, objects received euphemistic, noble names, and the individual actor’s tirade carried the plot forward. The meeting of the two women, Mary’s words, Elizabeth coming toward her like a noblewoman’s attendant in a play, recall theatrical conventions and mirror a pattern that would have been familiar to viewers of the period.
Information
1643–48
Possibly sold vente Burgevin, Paris, 1 Feb. 1832, lot 1(3 pieds 5 po. x. 2 pieds 9 po) and vente de Frainays, Paris 20-23, August 1833 lot 25.
Von Thum zu Heyl Collection, Pforzheim, Germany (said to have been acquired before his death in 1923 by the owner’s great-grandfather). Sale, Sotheby’s, London, December 12, 1990, cat. no. 58. Arhold, Inc., London. 1994 purchase by Princeton University Art Museum.
-
Bernard Dorival, Supplément au catalogue raisonné de l’œuvre de Philippe de Champaigne, (Paris: Chez de l’auteur: Distributeur, L. Laget, 1992).
, p. 20, no. 11 (illus.) - Jeremy Howard, Master paintings: Autumn 1994, (London: Algranti, 1994)., Illus. and discussed (unpaginated and unnumbered)
- Chronique des arts: supplément à la Gazette des beaux-arts (Mar., 1995)., p. 36, fig. 145
- "Acquisitions of the Art Museum 1994," Record of the Art Museum, Princeton University 54, no. 1 (1995): p. 40-79., p. 40 (illus.), p. 46
- Guy Wildenstein et al., The arts of France from Francois Ier to Napoleon Ier: a centennial celebration of Wildenstein's presence in New York, (New York: Wildenstein, 2005).
- Princeton University Art Museum: Handbook of the Collection (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007), p. 189 (illus.)
- Princeton University Art Museum: Handbook of the Collections (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Art Museum, 2013), p. 411